Fade to Black
25 April 2003
I don't watch television much. I know, as
a student of popular culture, that I should
watch it far more often. I tape Star Trek
for my dwindling family and occasionally
sneak a peek at Twilight Zone. In foreign
countries I watch MTV because of a fascination
with localization. Very rarely, I watch the
News. Like tonight, in a hotel room in Boston.
In one last gasp before returning to the
usual fare of murder and tornadoes in trailer
parks, CNN was sqeezing the last few eyeballs
out of the war. We were right after all -
the smoking gun has finally been found, under
a layer of white-out. Some pal of Bin Laden's
slept here. And in about 600 American motels
too, but what the hell.
CNN is like an uncle whom you know is a lying
slimebag used appliance salesman but hey,
he's your uncle. You know him. Tonight Uncle
CNN was showing "war stories" -
edited versions of footage shot during the
late victorious war, overdubbed with colorful
on-the-scene commentary. I was in no mood
for the upbeat "journalist talks about
his experiences" angle they were trying
to play. When they ran the memorial credits
of the journalists who died covering the
invasion, the list seemed nearly as long
as that of the military dead. Certainly the
journalist-to-soldier death ratio has gone
way, way up. I'm wondering why more journalists
are dying. Maybe they take more risks because
they think we need more information. Maybe
it's the embedded thing, to paraphrase W.
To CNN's credit, one of the dead they memorialized
worked for Al Jazira. Go figure.
So now the good, bad and other folk of Iraq
are left temporarily despot-free with a 250-billion-dollar
problem, give or take few hundred billion.
They seem to be saying that they want their
water and electricity turned back on and
we can get the hell out thank you very much.
But you hear the gleam in the eye of everybody
who talks about Iraq's debts, from the Kuwaitis
to the Americans to the French and German
banks who loaned Saddam money. (What kind
of idiot would loan Saddam money? - and did
they actually expect to get it back from
him? - why didn't somebody wearing a vest
and pocketwatch turned down the loan application?
- or maybe they figured they'd get it back
with the revenues from the oil rigtfully
owned by his citizen-victims when some World
Power made the miscreant leave the scene?
- but I digress.)
The Iraqi people seem to be not yet entirely
clear that the world community is intending
to squeeze those bucks out of their hides,
regardless of the fact that the bill was
run up by a crazed tyrant. Sort of like handing
the Iraqis a bill for being liberated so
that they can nobly endure a few more decades
of grinding poverty to do the right thing
by the French, the Germans, the Russians,
the Kuwaitis, and last but not least the
SUV drivers and big businesses of America
who by God need their tax cut. Never mind
that the "troubles" in Afghanistan
have dropped almost entirely out of the news.
Liberate-and-run is the neo(con) American
way. (If we keep cutting educational spending
here in the US of A along with everything
else in order to give that big TAX CUT, pretty
soon we won't have any more smarty-pants
critics of American Foreign Policy.) But
relax - the Iraqis won't really have to work
like little flagellantes to make it all right
again. They won't get the chance. Without
extremely strategic and committed support,
they'll have another tin god running the
show in no time, and this one will probably
be a religious nut to boot. And the Iraqi
people will be screwed again. It makes me
so ashamed I want to cry.
READ MY LIPS. I DON'T WANT A TAX CUT. I WANT
A GOVERNMENT I CAN BE PROUD OF.
[Insert provocative fact: W'S 550-billion-dollar
tax cut would more than pay for the reconstruction
of Iraq and Afghanistan with some spare change
left over for the International Space Station.]
The Kurds like us, apparently because we
haven't tried to kick them around like everyone
else in the region seems eager to do. I like
the Kurds. I like their green flags and their
enthusiasm. I like it that the bastard who
gassed them is gone, hopefully, to his reward.
But they are "not well liked,"
one might say, by the rest of the factions
in fractious Iraq, or by the Turks either.
It is my suspicion that neither the U.S.
nor the U.N. can presently protect the peoples
Iraq from one another. Without serious (and
I mean serious to the tune of your entire
tax cut, buddy, which in most cases is something
like a hundred bucks) investment, it seems
highly unlikely that the folks in Iraq and
Afghanistan are going to suddenly catch on
to democracy (although the Russians have
really raised the bar on that). Americans
have been working on it for well over two
hundred years and nearly everbody seems to
have forgotten about the hard parts like
freedom and justice or intellectual parts
like checks and balances. Just too damned
complicated.
Unless Iraqis study the fine points of history
they aren't going to get the meat of it since
we don't do it here any more. We don't even
make TV shows about doing it any more. Best
case, they'll say hey, I know what democracy
is! It's not about being controlled by your
local religious leader or warlord! It's about
electing the guy who gives the best commercials
on account of his campaign contributions!
It's not exactly secular because that would
be bad, but it's not exactly religious except
for that One Nation Under Bob stuff. Well,
frankly, it's ethically confusing but hey,
it creates wealth! And by golly, anybody who creates wealth
deserves a tax break, and shareholders deserve
a good return on investment even if it means
Iraqis have to farm out their manufacturing
jobs to China! And just in case you're thinking
of disagreeing with the government, we're
going to scan your underpants just like Secretary
Ashcroft does!
Iraq Libre, yo. Order it at your local bar.
It's just like a Cuba Libre except you substitute
despair for rum and hold the lime. It's a
very dark drink. |